Archive

Archive for December, 2006

Peace, Propaganda – The Promised Land

December 30, 2006 Rizwan 5 comments

Edited 21 Feb’2007: There was one full video on google videos but they removed it and put it on youtube. So youtube links are as under..

Peace, Propaganda & the Promised Land provides a striking comparison of U.S. and international media coverage of the crisis in the Middle East, zeroing in on how structural distortions in U.S. coverage have reinforced false perceptions of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This pivotal documentary exposes how the foreign policy interests of American political elites–oil, and a need to have a secure military base in the region, among others–work in combination with Israeli public relations strategies to exercise a powerful influence over how news from the region is reported.

Part 1:

Part 2:

Through the voices of scholars, media critics, peace activists, religious figures, and Middle East experts, Peace, Propaganda & the Promised Land carefully analyzes and explains how–through the use of language, framing and context–the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza remains hidden in the news media, and Israeli colonization of the occupied terrorities appears to be a defensive move rather than an offensive one. The documentary also explores the ways that U.S. journalists, for reasons ranging from intimidation to a lack of thorough investigation, have become complicit in carrying out Israel’s PR campaign. At its core, the documentary raises questions about the ethics and role of journalism, and the relationship between media and politics.

Categories: Life, Todays World

How I came to Love the Veil

December 26, 2006 Rizwan 1 comment

Click HERE to read the entire article written by Yvonne Ridley (Convert to Islam)

by: Yvonne Ridley
Sunday, October 22, 2006; Page B01
LONDON

I used to look at veiled women as quiet, oppressed creatures — until I was captured by the Taliban.

In September 2001, just 15 days after the terrorist attacks on the United States, I snuck into Afghanistan, clad in a head-to-toe blue burqa, intending to write a newspaper account of life under the repressive regime. Instead, I was discovered, arrested and detained for 10 days. I spat and swore at my captors; they called me a “bad” woman but let me go after I promised to read the Quran and study Islam. (Frankly, I’m not sure who was happier when I was freed — they or I.)

Back home in London, I kept my word about studying Islam — and was amazed by what I discovered. I’d been expecting Quran chapters on how to beat your wife and oppress your daughters; instead, I found passages promoting the liberation of women. Two-and-a-half years after my capture, I converted to Islam, provoking a mixture of astonishment, disappointment and encouragement among friends and relatives.

Now, it is with disgust and dismay that I watch here in Britain as former foreign secretary Jack Straw describes the Muslim nikab — a face veil that reveals only the eyes — as an unwelcome barrier to integration, with Prime Minister Tony Blair, writer Salman Rushdie and even Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi leaping to his defense.

Having been on both sides of the veil, I can tell you that most Western male politicians and journalists who lament the oppression of women in the Islamic world have no idea what they are talking about. They go on about veils, child brides, female circumcision, honor killings and forced marriages, and they wrongly blame Islam for all this — their arrogance surpassed only by their ignorance.

These cultural issues and customs have nothing to do with Islam. A careful reading of the Quran shows that just about everything that Western feminists fought for in the 1970s was available to Muslim women 1,400 years ago. Women in Islam are considered equal to men in spirituality, education and worth, and a woman’s gift for childbirth and child-rearing is regarded as a positive attribute.

When Islam offers women so much, why are Western men so obsessed with Muslim women’s attire? Even British government ministers Gordon Brown and John Reid have made disparaging remarks about the nikab — and they hail from across the Scottish border, where men wear skirts.

When I converted to Islam and began wearing a headscarf, the repercussions were enormous. All I did was cover my head and hair — but I instantly became a second-class citizen. I knew I’d hear from the odd Islamophobe, but I didn’t expect so much open hostility from strangers. Cabs passed me by at night, their “for hire” lights glowing. One cabbie, after dropping off a white passenger right in front of me, glared at me when I rapped on his window, then drove off. Another said, “Don’t leave a bomb in the back seat” and asked, “Where’s bin Laden hiding?”

Yes, it is a religious obligation for Muslim women to dress modestly, but the majority of Muslim women I know like wearing the hijab, which leaves the face uncovered, though a few prefer the nikab. It is a personal statement: My dress tells you that I am a Muslim and that I expect to be treated respectfully, much as a Wall Street banker would say that a business suit defines him as an executive to be taken seriously. And, especially among converts to the faith like me, the attention of men who confront women with inappropriate, leering behavior is not tolerable.

I was a Western feminist for many years, but I’ve discovered that Muslim feminists are more radical than their secular counterparts. We hate those ghastly beauty pageants, and tried to stop laughing in 2003 when judges of the Miss Earth competition hailed the emergence of a bikini-clad Miss Afghanistan, Vida Samadzai, as a giant leap for women’s liberation. They even gave Samadzai a special award for “representing the victory of women’s rights.”

Some young Muslim feminists consider the hijab and the nikab political symbols, too, a way of rejecting Western excesses such as binge drinking, casual sex and drug use. What is more liberating: being judged on the length of your skirt and the size of your surgically enhanced breasts, or being judged on your character and intelligence? In Islam, superiority is achieved through piety — not beauty, wealth, power, position or sex.

I didn’t know whether to scream or laugh when Italy’s Prodi joined the debate last week by declaring that it is “common sense” not to wear the nikab because it makes social relations “more difficult.” Nonsense. If this is the case, then why are cellphones, landlines, e-mail, text messaging and fax machines in daily use? And no one switches off the radio because they can’t see the presenter’s face.

Under Islam, I am respected. It tells me that I have a right to an education and that it is my duty to seek out knowledge, regardless of whether I am single or married. Nowhere in the framework of Islam are we told that women must wash, clean or cook for men. As for how Muslim men are allowed to beat their wives — it’s simply not true. Critics of Islam will quote random Quranic verses or Hadith, but usually out of context. If a man does raise a finger against his wife, he is not allowed to leave a mark on her body, which is the Quran’s way of saying, “Don’t beat your wife, stupid.”

It is not just Muslim men who must reevaluate the place and treatment of women. According to a recent National Domestic Violence Hotline survey, 4 million American women experience a serious assault by a partner during an average 12-month period. More than three women are killed by their husbands and boyfriends every day — that is nearly 5,500 since 9/11.

Violent men don’t come from any particular religious or cultural category; one in three women around the world has been beaten, coerced into sex or otherwise abused in her lifetime, according to the hotline survey. This is a global problem that transcends religion, wealth, class, race and culture.

But it is also true that in the West, men still believe that they are superior to women, despite protests to the contrary. They still receive better pay for equal work — whether in the mailroom or the boardroom — and women are still treated as sexualized commodities whose power and influence flow directly from their appearance.

And for those who are still trying to claim that Islam oppresses women, recall this 1992 statement from the Rev. Pat Robertson, offering his views on empowered women: Feminism is a “socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians.”

Now you tell me who is civilized and who is not.

Yvonne Ridley is political editor of Islam Channel TV in London, UK &

coauthor of “In the Hands of the Taliban: Her Extraordinary Story” (Robson Books).

Categories: Islam

Christmas Day

December 22, 2006 Rizwan 1 comment

Christmas Day is celebrated on December 25th. It is a statutory holiday throughout Canada. If it falls on a Saturday or a Sunday, the next working day is considered a legal holiday.

Christmas is a Christian holiday celebrating the ‘birth of Jesus Christ’. In the third century, efforts were made to find out the date of the Nativity (birth of Jesus – Eisa (peace be upon Him)], but only in the year 336 was the date of the December 25 festival set in commemoration of Jesus’ birth. Pope Julius formally selected December 25 as the day of Christmas in 349 C.E..

Origin of Christmas

The early pagans & mushrikeen (those who associate partners with The Almighty God) of the Northern countries have always observed the period of time when the cold season reached its peak and the days began to shorten. Hence, December 21st is regarded as the shortest day of the calendar year. These early pagans would worship their gods and goddesses during this transformation of the season. For example in ancient Rome, from Dec 17th to Dec. 24th the mushrikeen would celebrate a festival in honor of Saturn, the god of time. Similarly during this period, the Druids would celebrate a festival in honor of the Sun god. The ancient Germanic tribes celebrated the pagan feast of twelve nights from Dec. 25th to Jan. 6th. The conflicts of the forces of nature were represented as battles between the gods. The birthday of the Sun god (Mithra) was celebrated on Dec. 25th and was known as the Lord’s Day long before the Christian Era. (Source: Mithras, the Fellow in the Cap, Holiday Myths)

Actual date of the birth of Jesus (Eisa, peace be upon Him)

Christmas (Dec. 25th) is not the actual date of the birth of Jesus but rather a compromise with paganism. The Gospel does not clarify regarding the seasons of the year when Jesus was born. On the other hand, they do tell us that shepherds were guarding their flocks in the open air (see: Luke 2:1-20 – King James Version). This is why, many of the early leaders of the Church considered it most likely that the birth of Jesus occurred in the late summer or early Fall/Autumn. It is due to this and other innumerable facts which indicate that Christmas (Dec. 25th) actually has nothing to do with Jesus. In the TIME magazine (Canadian version dated Dec 13th 2004) the cover story (Behind the First Noel) by David Van Biema, writes “Indeed, the Christmas story that Christians know by heart is actually a collection of mysteries. Where was Jesus actually born? Who showed up to celebrate his arrival? How do the details of the stories reflect the specific outreach agendas of the men who wrote them?”

The Christmas of Today – Merriment & Materialism

Nowadays, when Christmas is mentioned, most people immediately think of Santa Claus instead of Jesus. The image of Jesus son of Mariam (Mary, mercy be upon Her) is secondary and many a times lost in the enjoyment and materialism. People spend thousands of dollars purchasing gifts & presents for each other during Christmas. In fact most people sink into debt that can last for a year or two, if not more.

Jesus was a very humble and simple man. He distant himself from the material world possessing almost nothing of this world. He was full of good character and worshiped the One true God, the Almighty. Only those who follow his lifestyle can be regarded as nearest to him.

Symbols of Christmas

SANTA CLAUS & GIFTS: Santa Claus is not of Christian origin. Santa Claus is a mythical old man who brings gifts to children at Christmas time (ofcourse nowadays, gifts are purchased by parents & friends and the children are told that the gifts have been brought by Santa Claus). Today’s version of Santa originally developed from a real person, Saint Nicholas, who lived 1700 years ago. He was bishop of Myra, an ancient town of Lycia, now in Turkey. He was extremely kind and often went out at night, taking presents to the needy. His generosity was not bound by any particular time of the year. He was much loved by his community for his kindness. After his death which occurred on the 6th day of December, school boys all over Europe celebrated a feast day every year on the anniversary of his death. Children were so fond of Saint Nicholas and his habit of bringing gifts that the custom of celebrating his feast day on the 6th day of December was maintained for hundreds of years. In England, Saint Nicholas Day festivities were banned when Henry VIII founded the church of England. They were later resumed when Queen Victoria married German Prince Albert, but Saint Nicholas in his return was transformed to Father Christmas and appeared on Christmas Eve, the 24th day of December, not the originally celebrated date of December 6th. The N. American tradition of Santa Claus was taken from the altered English version. Santa Claus (a German translation of St. Nicholas) was modeled after a man of kindness, generosity and compassion. It was only in the last few hundred years that Santa Claus was associated with the Christian holiday of Christmas.

Lights: The mushrikeen Druids would celebrate a festival in honor of the Sun god during this period because of the change in season. During their celebrations torches were lit and strange ceremonies were enacted in honor of the Sun god. (Source: Holiday Myths)

The Christmas tree: Mushrikeen during their festivals would decorate trees in honor of the god of time. At the very tip, the representation of a radiant sun would be placed there in honor of Apollo, the sun-god to whom the final days of December were dedicated. (Source: 1001 Christmas Facts and Fancies)

Categories: Christianity

A Story: A Slave and A Lion

December 20, 2006 Rizwan Leave a comment

Kindness is a noble sentiment. There is an ancient story which shows that even the fierce animals are affected by kindness.

It is said that in a certain country there lives a slave who was a kind man. His master was cruel, and tortured him without any excuse. The slave did everything to please his master but to no avail. So he decided to run away.

One night he did escape out of the house and took the road that led to another city. On the way he reached a big forest and sat down under a tree for rest.

Suddenly, he heard a roar and the next moment a big lion was standing near him. He could not run away. Then he saw that the lion did not jump at him. It was striking its paw on the ground. The slave saw that there was blood on it. He slowly and carefully reached the lion’s paw and found a big thorn like stem in it. He took out that thorn. The lion licked his feet and went away.

After a short time he heard voices of people. Before he could run away, a group of soldiers had surrounded and arrested him. He was taken back to the city and put into the prison. His master had lodged a complaint with the government, for the slave had no right to run away. The authorities decided that the slave should be thrown before a hungry lion so that the other slaves would not dare follow his example.

On the day of execution, the soldiers brought him to the arena built for such purposes, and they pushed him into the cage of a big hungry lion. As soon as the lion saw him, it began to roar. But suddenly it stopped roaring and began to lick the feet of that condemned man. It was the same lion whom the slave had helped in the forest. It had recognized him.

Categories: Morals

Dumb or Dumber!

December 18, 2006 Rizwan Leave a comment

A Question: How much we know about the world we are living in and especially about the world or part of the world, which we are so worried about? That we overlook our own place such as Orlando; which is a total disaster; and degrade/criticize others’ places. Check out this video and you will know!!

Pitty isnt it! While reading novels and fanfictions, we should also take out some time to read or research about the world, other countries, their religion, history, culture, etc. And try to be more educated in this modern world, especially if we want to talk about the ‘world’ or parts of the world.

Categories: Todays World

Male circumcision ‘cuts’ HIV risk

December 16, 2006 Rizwan Leave a comment

Foreskin cells are thought to be more vulnerable to HIV infection.

Male circumcision ‘could significantly reduce‘ the burden of HIV, a study suggested earlier in 2005. Now as of 13 December 2006, Experts say circumcision ‘can cut‘ the rate of HIV infection in heterosexual men by 50%, results from two African trials show.

It concluded that the operation could avert about six million HIV infections and three million deaths in sub-Saharan Africa over the next 20 years.

The findings build on research, published in 2005, that suggested circumcision reduced HIV infection risk in heterosexual men by about 60%.

The research is published in the journal PLoS Medicine.

An international team of researchers used data on HIV infection rates and the prevalence of male circumcision across Africa to predict the potential impact.

Using mathematical modelling, they looked at what would happen if, over the next 10 years, all men in sub-Saharan Africa were circumcised.

They calculated that within a decade some two million new HIV infections and 300,000 deaths could be prevented. And in the ten years after that, a further 3.7 million infections and 2.7 million deaths could be avoided – with one in four of the deaths prevented being in South Africa.

The findings are so striking, the US National Institutes of Health decided it would be unethical to continue and stopped the trials early.

The two trials of around 8,000 men took place in Uganda and Kenya were due to finish in July and September 2007 respectively.

But after an interim review of the data by the NIH Data and Safety Monitoring Board, it was decided to halt the trials as it was unethical not to offer circumcision in the men who were acting as controls.

Bleeding less likely

The trial in Kenya found a 53% reduction in new HIV infections in heterosexual men who were circumcised while the Ugandan study reported a drop of 48%.

Results last year from a study in 3,280 heterosexual men in South Africa, which was also stopped early, showed a 60% drop in the incidence of new infections in men who had been circumcised.

There are several reasons why circumcision may protect against HIV infection.

Specific cells in the foreskin may be potential targets for HIV infection and also the skin under the foreskin becomes less sensitive and is less likely to bleed reducing risk of infection following circumcision.

When Aids first began to emerge in Africa, researchers noted that men who were circumcised seemed to be less at risk of infection but it was unclear whether this was due to differences in sexual behaviour.

A modelling study done by international Aids experts earlier this year showed that male circumcision could avert about six million HIV infections and three million deaths in sub-Saharan Africa.

A further trial in Uganda to assess the risk of HIV transmission to female partners is due to report in 2008 but the effect among men who have sex with men has not yet been studied.

Social factors & Implementation

Catherine Hankins, chief scientific adviser to the United Nations Programme on HIV/Aids (UNAIDS) and a co-author on the study, said: “The big message from the paper is that there is a tremendous potential for male circumcision to have an effect on the HIV epidemic, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa.

Currently, she said, circumcision in sub-Saharan Africa varied greatly per country: “In west and central Africa have high circumcision rates and lower HIV rates. Southern and eastern Africa have lower circumcision rates and higher HIV rates.”

Dr Kevin De Cock, director of the HIV/Aids department of the World Health Organization told the BBC the results were a “significant scientific advance” but were not a magic bullet and would never replace existing prevention strategies.

“We will have to convene a meeting which we hope will happen quite soon to review the data in more detail and have discussions about the implications.

“This is an intervention that must be embedded with all the other interventions and precautions we have. Men must not consider themselves protected. It’s a very important intervention to add to our prevention armamentarium.”

NIH director Dr Elias Zerhouni said: “Male circumcision performed safely in a medical environment complements other HIV prevention strategies and could lessen the burden of HIV/Aids, especially in countries in sub-Saharan Africa where, according to the 2006 estimates from UNAids, 2.8 million new infections occurred in a single year.”

Dr Jeckoniah Ndinya-Achola, co-principal investigator at the University of Nairobi, Kenya said: “The Ministry of Health of the Kenyan government is already holding discussions about how this can be made available. It will need a certain amount of improvement to existing facilities.”

Deborah Jack, chief executive of the National AIDS Trust, said: “These findings are encouraging and it is clear the promotion of voluntary circumcision can play an important role in reducing the risk of HIV transmission, as part of a comprehensive prevention programme.

“However, people who are circumcised can still be infected with HIV and any awareness campaign would have to be extremely careful not to suggest that it protects against HIV or is an alternative to using condoms.”

[courtesy of journal PLoS Medicine, BBC news, etc.]

Categories: Todays World

A Story: Stag and his horns

December 15, 2006 Rizwan 1 comment

Once a stag felt thirsty and went to a stream of water. As he was drinking water, he saw his reflection in the clear stream. First he looked at his horns. They were beautiful and strong, and they glittered under the strong sun. He was captivated by their beauty. He forgot his thirst and stood there admiring them.

Then his eyes wandered to his legs. They appeared thin, weak and shaky. “What a pair of ugly legs I have!” he thought.

He was absorbed in these thoughts, when he heard the barking of hounds right at his heels. With a start, he sprang up and ran for his life. Soon he was at a safe distance, and he hid himself in a bush.

But the hounds had not lost his scent. They followed him and reached the bush. The stag jumped up but fell back. His antlers had been caught in the bush. He struggled very hard but to no avail. He cursed his horns, but that did not help. With a cry of triumph the hounds fell upon him and tore him to pieces.

Categories: Morals

Video: Mufti Muhammad Taqi Usmani on “Women Protection Bill”

December 14, 2006 Rizwan Leave a comment

First time ever: Interview of Retired Cheif Justice Shari’at Court, Mufti Muhammad Taqi Usmani by Dr. Shahid Masood on the Truth behind the recently approved bill by National Assembly of Pakistan entitled “Protection of Women (Criminal Laws Amendment) Act, 2006” or should I say fake “Women Protection Bill”.

Categories: Islam, Todays World